«

»

Jul 19

Jurisdiction affirms Bledsoe’s removal

OKLAHOMA CITY (UMNS) — South Central Jurisdictional Conference delegates on Thursday afternoon, July 19, overwhelmingly affirmed their episcopacy committee’s decision to compel Bishop W. Earl Bledsoe’s early retirement as bishop.

After an emotional discussion that included pointed questions for the committee, the final tally was 208 to 45.

The episcopacy committee announced that morning it would seek the full conference’s approval of its July 17 decision — by a vote of 24 to four with two abstentions — to place Bledsoe in involuntary retirement. The 30-member committee includes a lay and clergy member from each of the jurisdiction’s 15 current conferences.

Bledsoe, 61 and in his first term as bishop, has led the North Texas Annual (regional) Conference for four years. He was the first bishop elected during the 2008 South Central Jurisdiction.

Don House, the committee’s chair, told the delegates before their vote that the panel had heard complaints about Bledsoe that could have ended with him losing his clerical credentials.

“We had concerns of complaints coming that would be formal charges, and those complaints if processed would not come out in a very good place,” House told the body. “The end result has the possibility of him being stripped of credentials. So we looked for a compassionate path.”

When the bishop reversed his decision to retire voluntarily, House said, holding a hearing to vote on involuntary retirement was the next “most graceful mode we could find.”

In response to House’s remarks, Bledsoe told the body that any complaint against him under church law should have gone through the denomination’s process for dealing with such matters.

“There have been rumors of a complaint; there have been threats of a complaint,” he said. “But any person within the church whom someone files a complaint against or files a charge against ought to be considered innocent until proven guilty and should be allowed to be able to address that.

“When Don House talks and gives those little zingers, it makes it sound like he somehow is trying to protect me. I want you to know that does not need to happen.”

Bishops typically do not have voice or vote at jurisdictional conferences, but the conference made an exception to allow Bledsoe to address what some delegates are calling a crisis.

The public dispute between Bledsoe and his episcopacy committee — believed to be a first in The United Methodist Church’s 44-year history — has overshadowed the jurisdictional conference.

What happens next

What happens next likely will be up to the Judicial Council, The United Methodist Church’s equivalent of the U.S. Supreme Court.

Bledsoe has not announced yet whether he will appeal the episcopacy committee’s ruling. He has 30 days to make that decision.

But, in its next session in October, the Judicial Council already has agreed to review a request from the South Central Jurisdiction College of Bishops for a declaratory decision on the church law provision the episcopacy committee referred to in making its decision on Bledsoe.

Paragraph 408.3 of the Book of Discipline, the denomination’s law book, says that a jurisdictional episcopacy committee, by a two-thirds vote, can place a bishop “in retired relation” if the committee finds it “to be in the best interests of the bishop and/or the Church.”

Oklahoma Area Bishop Robert E. Hayes Jr., who presided over the afternoon session, told the jurisdictional delegates that the paragraph was amended at the recently concluded 2012 General Conference, the denomination’s top lawmaking body.

The amendment added a sentence that said the committee would need to report clearly the reason for a decision to involuntary retirement to the jurisdictional conference. The change took effect immediately.

If he appeals, Bledsoe will remain under appointment. The episcopacy committee has clarified that South Central Jurisdictional Conference will elect three bishops at this meeting, just as it planned before the hearing.

“I want you to know that I am honored to serve as a bishop of the church,” Bledsoe told the delegates. “I want you to know I have not violated any of the sacred trust that this conference bestowed on me in 2008 when you elected me, and I want you to know I am available for an assignment.”

San Antonio Area Bishop James E. Dorff, president of the South Central Jurisdiction College of Bishops, said in a statement that the jurisdiction’s bishops “believe and trust that these processes have and will be followed until a final resolution is reached.

“As this unfolds, we intend to be available to all parties for guidance and pastoral support as called upon,” said his statement on behalf of the college.

Morning session

House initially presented the committee’s report on its hearing with Bledsoe. He repeatedly stressed that this was an arduous process.

The committee’s evaluation of Bishop Bledsoe revealed many strong qualities, House said, but revealed concerns about “his supervision of members of his cabinet, actions that polarized the conference, and concerns about the appointment-making process and protocol.”

The committee’s hearing with Bledsoe stretched for seven-and-a-half hours over two days. However, the bishop “failed to fully answer a number of questions, and some of his answers raised questions for the committee about his integrity and trustworthiness,” House said.

“The committee was not convinced that he could restore trust in his current residential assignment or create trust in a new one.”

As House delivered the report, Bledsoe was sitting on the dais with the committee chair and with other active and retired bishops in the South Central Jurisdiction.

“Obviously I disagree with what was said this morning,” Bledsoe told United Methodist News Service. “He basically called me a liar. I would not do my friends like that.”

Bledsoe said he did not receive a copy of the episcopacy committee’s report before House spoke to the full conference.

“All I have asked throughout this process is fairness,” he said. “We may not all agree, but we ought to treat each other fairly.”

Afternoon questions

During the afternoon, the committee faced questions from delegates about the process it used to arrive at the decision.

Billy Ratliff, a member of St. Luke “Community” United Methodist Church in Dallas, said that as a manager at IBM he has to put employees on a probationary plan before terminating them.

“I understand the committee doesn’t have the authority to do what I just said, to put someone on a plan,” he said. “But somehow, some way, there has to be someone with that authority.”

The Rev. Jeff Lust, a New Mexico district superintendent and episcopacy committee member, told those gathered that the committee wrestled with many of the same questions.

House said that Bledsoe did undergo nine months of coaching through a program offered by Duke Divinity School.

“We did not see growth,” House said. “We did not have high hopes that there would be progress in the next quadrennium, and we did not think for the health of the jurisdiction or any of the episcopal areas that that would be good for the church.”

House, a lay member in the Texas Conference where Bledsoe served before being elected bishop, said he has known Bledsoe for a long time and considers the bishop a friend. At times, House was overcome with emotion while describing the situation.

“There will be a day when I wake up and this is not the first thing on my mind,” he said at the end of his remarks. “I look forward to that day.”

 

14 comments

6 pings

Skip to comment form

  1. Robert R Jackson

    Iam asking for specifics: charge A……………………… by whom……………………….?…when………………………….?.corroborating evidence……………………………..?………bod…………………………………….
    charge B……………………………………………by whom……………………………….?……………………..when………………………….Corroborating evidence.?…………………….bod…………………………….?

    Bishops answers to charges?

    1. Mark West

      Perhaps you could make your point a little more accessible?

  2. Richard Miller

    It is way past time in the church for us to put aside “not wanting to embarrass” someone and “taking the most compassionate course” and keeping secrets from the church! I’m grateful the Southeast Jurisdictional Committee on Episcopacy takes its work seriously – it’s more than I can say for the North Central Jurisdictional Committee on Episcopacy, who refuses to respond when Bishops are blatently neglecting local churches in conflict with pastors.

    But this “let’s keep it under the table” approach to accountability merely continues the sense that this is a “Good Ole Boy” network, and if you’re tight with the network, things are fine, but if you cross it, you’re in trouble. At this point no one beyond the Committee – and perhaps the Jurisdictional Conference, although the reporting does not make it clear as to how much specific information they were given – has any basis for knowing whether or not Bishop Bledsoe should be retired. And from the other Bishops, like my old friend Jim Dorff, all we get is “trust the process… trust the process.” Well, the process has been so uneven and downright dysfunctional that there is no trust to be had!

    Have we learned nothing from our Roman Catholic friends and the way they’ve been dragged kicking and screaming into dealing with their sex abuse scandals in more transparent, open and accountable ways? For the good of the church, both internally and with regard to its witness to the world, it’s time for us to be transparent, open and accountable!

    All we have at this point is a lot of bad feeling about whether or not Bishop Bledsoe was dealt with appropriately or got a raw deal. This does not advance the cause of justice, trust, witness or even compassion. It would be more compassionate to name the alleged offences. At least then, if the charges were sustained, those supporting Bishop Bledsoe could seek to help him rebuild his life and his ministry. As it is, they simply feel, “he got screwed,” and there’s really no way to claim otherwise with the hush-hush nature of the proceedings. And the rest of us are left with a bad taste in our mouths, because we’ve been around long enough to know that with fallable human beings, you can’t just “trust the process!”

  3. Moses Woodruff

    I agree that keeping “rumors as complaints” under the rug, only keeps the good ole boy network in place. It’s a travesty to entertain rumor as a legitimate complaint in concern for the church. If the church can’t withstand discussion, then it is on weak ground!

  4. DIANE

    YOU ARE EXACTLY CORRECT. WE HAVE THE SAME PROBLEMS IN SOUTH CAROLINA. THE CONFERENCE CLOSED OUR CHURCH WITH A 30 DAY NOTICE, BECAUSE WE ARE A SMALL RURAL CHURCH AND DONT BRING IN ENOUGH MONEY , WHAT HAPPENED TO MINISTERS, BISHOPS BEING GODLY. OUR MINISTER FLAT OUT LIED TO US ABOUT THE PENDING DOOM OF OUR CHURCH, AND OF COURSE, WE HAVE NO SAY SO. THE SO CALLED PASTOR NEEDS TO GO AND ANYONE ABOVE HER THAT KEEPS HIDING THINGS. AND THEN TH HIGHER UPS QUESTION WHY TH E CHURCHES ARE DYING, PEOPLE ARE LOSING THEIR TRUST IN WHO’S RUNNING THEM.

  5. Reverend Terrence K. Hayes

    Here is a quote from the Southern Poverty Law Center: I wonder if it is appropriate yp?
    “Since 2000, the number of hate groups,[in the United States] has increased by 69 percent. This surge has been fueled by anger and fear over the nation’s ailing economy, an influx of non-white immigrants, and the diminishing white majority, as symbolized by the election of the nation’s first African-American president.” Copied from the Southern Poverty Law Center……site
    Could bishop Bledsoe have been on the receiving end of this phase in our American Culture. I believe that Church Culture is strong reflection of the larger society.

    1. Mark West

      Huh?

      1. methodistpie

        Are you suggesting the Committee on Episcopacy is a hate group?
        .

    2. Loren Harmon

      Are you giving the “Southern Poverty Law Center” automatic gravitas in asserting a 69% growth in “hate groups”? An educated person would retain philosophic doubt. A true liberal would ask what instrument and methodology was used to to produce such a statistic. Read some opposition material about the organization — “Sourcewatch” comes to mind.

  6. Reverend Terrence K. Hayes

    Here is a quote from the Southern Poverty Law Center: I wonder if it is appropriate ?
    “Since 2000, the number of hate groups,[in the United States] has increased by 69 percent. This surge has been fueled by anger and fear over the nation’s ailing economy, an influx of non-white immigrants, and the diminishing white majority, as symbolized by the election of the nation’s first African-American president.” Copied from the Southern Poverty Law Center……site
    Could bishop Bledsoe have been on the receiving end of this phase in our American Culture. I believe that Church Culture is strong reflection of

  7. Victor Eremita

    This is a good day for the Church – a Bishop being held accountable for being ineffective, or in this case incompetent.

  8. Really

    As a member of the Texas Annual Conference, I feel for Don House who is a godly man carrying out his duty to the Lord and his church. There is so much no one will ever know and that is as it must be since we can’t all sit in judgment. The vote was overwhelming. There is no racism and that is a sad tactic to use. It is so obvious to anyone that can read between the lines that Earl has lost the confidence of those he was privileged and called to lead. He cannot get it back. Bishops, and the rest of clergy, do not have a right to be a pastor or bishop. We have a privilege and a responsibility. For the best interest of the church, it should end with this vote. We will see if the Lord’s church is put first or the ambition of men.

  9. Dee Dowdy

    “The end result has the possibility of him being stripped of credentials. So we looked for a compassionate path.”

    While I am thankful that the comittee did try to do the right thing, the comment above concerns me. Let me explain: if the bishop had done something that might even cost him his credentias as an elder, should not that have been pursued? Because if he did something worthy of this comment and yet we retire him, doesn’t he get to keep his salary as a bishop for life even though he alledgedly did something bad? If an non-bishop elder did the same thing, would s/he get the same treatment? I’m just sayin….

  10. james churchill

    Well, what did he do to cause this action. The above information tells me little or nothing. A few words would be helpful: did he steal? is he gay? what did he do to cause this action.

    You do not do us any service if you cloud your comments such that the uninformed remain uninformed.

    Thank you.

  1. Bledsoe retired as of Aug. 31; recommendations for 2 other conferences » Episcopal Elections

    [...] an emotional discussion on July 19, the South Central Jurisdictional Conference delegates overwhelmingly affirmed their episcopacy commi… to compel early retirement. The final tally was 208 to [...]

  2. Fall 2012 Judicial Council roundup » UMC Connnections

    [...] committee on episcopacy cited in its decision in July to remove Bledsoe from active assignment. The jurisdictional delegates affirmed the committee’s decision. Bledsoe will appeal that action at a special called session of the Judicial Council on Nov. 9-11 in [...]

  3. Top court reinstates ‘retired’ bishop - United Methodist Connections

    [...] On July 16-17, the committee on episcopacy conducted a hearing on the issue before deliberating for about nine hours. The decision resulting in Bledsoe’s involuntary retirement was backed by the jurisdictional conference. [...]

  4. Pacific Northwest UMC News Blog – Top court reinstates ‘retired’ bishop

    [...] On July 16-17, the committee on episcopacy conducted a hearing on the issue before deliberating for about nine hours. The decision resulting in Bledsoe’s involuntary retirement was backed by the jurisdictional conference. [...]

  5. Bishop Bledsoe’s reinstatement moves forward - UMC Connections

    [...] South Central Jurisdictional Conference delegates on July 19 overwhelmingly affirmed the episcopacy committee’s decision to compel early retirement.  The final tally was [...]

  6. Bledsoe nominated to lead Northwest Texas-N.M. area - United Methodist Connections

    [...] South Central Jurisdictional Conference delegates on July 19 overwhelmingly affirmed the episcopacy committee’s decision to compel early retirement. The final tally was [...]

Comments have been disabled.